Date: 10/19/01 6:44:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: (American Patriot Friends Network)
To: (APFN Yahoogroups)

Here is how the WTC/Pentagon crash bombing operation came...

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: WTC    F R A M E - U P     P S Y - O P   C A S E   S O L V E D  -
-  W H O   A N D   W H Y  -- w. ample evidence assembled
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:45:16 -0700
From: "Dick Eastman" <>
To: <>

Here is how the WTC/Pentagon crashbombing operation came,
about,with strong documentary evidence available supporting every
step of this scenario. I am willing to field all questions discussants
can devise to test this solution.

Mossad and the CIA were dealing Afghan-opium-derived "China-
white"  heroin or  at least were devoting effort to protect the
supply sources of the multi-trillion-dollar money-laundered
deposits backing the global investments of American
and British merchant banks.  The Afghan Northern Alliance
druglords grow 80 to 90 percent of the worlds opium, the
prime ingredient of heroin, which is then moved over the small
China-Afghan boarder for processing and distribution by the
giant People's Liberation Army - Triad  transnational corporation-
drug cartel-and military instrument.   Against this giant network
the religious  Taliban had been erradicating Afghan opium production,
suppressing production and profits for druglords, bankers and
globalization capitalists alike.

Thus this became the initial motivation of a renegade group of CIA
and/or Mossad having an interest in defeating Taliban.
(Nothing absurd so far, right?)

Next, the Russian and Kazakh mafias have ties with U.S. executive
James Giffen in Kazakhstan  --  a man under investigation by
a New York grand jury in the months before September 11
for illegal involvement in an oil swaps between Kazakhstan
and sanctioned Iran  (read the Aug. 9 New Yorker Magazine
for a full account of this by Seymore Hershe -- I have already
presented long excerpts of this in past posts) --  and all of the
evidence for this crime was being  kept on the 20th through
25th floor of one of the WTC towers where the FBI had its
New York Offices.  And James Giffen is the man anyone has
to go through to get any oil agreement with Kazakhstan --
including any pipelines built that would traverse Afghanistan.
(There is $6 trillion dollars worth of oil and gas in Central Asia.)
Giffen certainly understood -- if he did not originate the idea --
that if he couldcan get operatives (even "captured" vengeful Islamic
activists whose rage could be shaped and directed  to use of terror)
to destroy the FBI offices in the WTC building and the documentation
evidence it contained, then he would be escape grand jury indictment
--  and, as an powerful added benefit, the (framed) Taliban would get
replaced with a regime in Afghanistan that would permit a pipeline to be
built -- preferably a Northern Alliance druglord government that would
harmonize with Giffen's own unethical (murderous) entrepreneurial style.
(See the New Yorker article for details of Giffen's history.)

(So far this super-crime scheme involves only a small group of people--
Russian Mafia and perhaps a Giffen - renegade CIA or a  Giffen
"dark-side" Mossad link.  But other, even more powerful players
may have had involvement -- certainly they stood to gain
tremendously if the crashbomb frame-up were successfully accomplished.
(Prior to September 11 charges had been brought against
Alan Greenspan (forgive me -- in a previous post I said "Milton Friedman"
instead of Greenspan -- Friedman is a great and honest and honorable
academic scholar and Nobel Prize winner  -- who, very superficially,
looks like Greenspan)
-- at any rate, Alan Greenspan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan & Co. and other
powerful American financial figures and institutions had charges brought
against them -- reportedly a very well-documented case --over the fixing
of gold prices -- with evidence for that case too stored by the FBI
on the FBI floors of the WTC!  These parties would not only profit
heavily from the "carrot" of both oil and drug monies circulating through
their great
financial institutions, but they also would gain from avoiding the "stick"
of one of the most threatening lawsuits ever to confront the U.S. financial
establishment (realize what a guilty verdict in this case would mean to
these leading financial families and to the Establishment in general!) --
these parties would welcome predictable and certainly substantial
benefits from the the destruction of the evidence in the WTC
and of some of the witnesses and researchers on the case as well.)

Notice that so far we have powerful men with powerful incentives
who characteristically operate in secret and under the protection
of wealth, status and power  -- both the carrot ($2 trillion in annual
drug revenues funneled through the banking system -- which has
funded much of the proceeds to fund the development of the
Princeling-Triad dictatorship in China, btw, -- (The communist government
has been in the opium business since the 1930's -- Mao pioneered the
model later followed by Peru's Shining Path and Colombia's Maoist
F.A.R.C. narco-terrorists.  And Zhou Enlai devised the plan in the 1950's
of weakening American society through a drug invasion.)

"China white" heroin distributed by the People's Liberation Army,
made from Afghan opium  links all banker and oilman to the corrupt
and renegade the secret state agencies, CIA, FBI, and Mossad
--  renegade agents of either agency may have seen this opportunity
for mutual gain and found the way -- having profiles of each of the
players -- to propose the crashbombing frame-up as the best "solution"
to each of players most troublesome problems, while making enormous
profits besides.

Note that the Bush's are tied to both the CIA and oil and, through
Mena Arkansas drug smuggling and through the Iran-Contra
drugs and arms deals etc. (drugworld investigator Daniel Hopsicker,
as well as Noam Chomsky and many others have exposed this
thoroughly --  at least in the broad strokes necessary to support
this reconstruction of the crime.)

(The facts of the drug connections are known to everyone from
the Russians, to the John Birchers, to Wired Magazine, Harpers,
New Yorker, the Village Voice, the Nation, and  Rolling  Stone
Magazine, all having explored the drug - Establishment connections
in great detail.)

Which brings us to Ariel Sharon.  His hard-head policy of
retaliation regardless of collateral damage and his provocation
at the mosque cost him dearly in world opinion.  In fact the
Bush administration was very close to making initiating a major
policy shift -- obviously known to Sharon from the greatest intelligence
organization in the world -- Bush was planning the  the
recognition/sponsorship of a separate Palestinian state.  (Also
war crime charges had been brought against Sharon in international
court, further putting his hard-line policy against the Palestinians
in unfavorable light.

Mindful of Ariel Sharon's self-made hard spot, it is entirely
possible that the same CIA or Mossad mastermind that thought of
the crashbombing frame-up plan in the first place decided to take
the risk of telling Sharon about the plan, offering it as a solution
to the trapped old "freedom fighter's" problems as well.  If the
U.S. could be made to think that the hated Osama bin Laden --
that Islamic fundamentalism itself -- is responsible for destroying
twin towers of the WTC and the American government itself,
then, Sharon would certainly grasp, American opinion would
radically swing to an extremely  hard line against all Moslem
and Arab entities not securely under their thumb, and most
particularly, from Sharon's viewpoint, against Palestinians.

No profile of Sharon gives any indication that he would not
close on such a deal, such a serving of his higher good, his
prime directive.

And that is all that was needed to carry off this operation.

The getting and conditioning/deceiving of hijackers is an easy affair.
Mossad has infiltrated bin Ladin's forces in Central Asia and the Mideast
-- but it is a radically decentralized organization (as it must be to
remain viable)
and so it was an easy matter for this "dark-side" Mossad, with Sharon's
clandestine approval, to trick some very angry and vengeful Arabs into
thinking they were doing bin Ladens or some other anti-Zionist or anti-
Globalization radicals to agree to hijack the four planes. Millions in the
world hated the America and the globalization that the World Trade Center
represents. These recruited hijackers need not have been Arabs -- there
are Croats, Serbs, Latin Americans, and Iranians and any number
of other victim-pool people who could have volunteered to conduct
the hijacking -- possibly without fully understanding the end result of
the mission --   they need not have "signed on" for a suicide bombing.
(Many aviation experts on the net are describing a system built
into commercial airliners for taking over control of flight from the
ground, a system developed to combat terrorism. It  is possible
that the course of the plane's flight  was taken over by this system
installed to thwart hijackers (detailed in several reports
on the web.)  But if the crashes were not effected in this way,
psychological-control methods, wholly sufficient for the job, were
also available.  The technology of behavior control is further
advanced than the popular press has made people aware.
Skilled psy op agents can get subjects angry enough and
convinced enough of the justice and good effects of "acts'
represented as serving their 'cause" to be willing to undertake
even suicidal missions.  (Activist Alan Yu has researched this
technology as have other researchers from a broad spectrum
of political orientation.)

And this is all that is needed to conduct the terror act.

But then what?

When the crashes take place -- word merely has to be
put out by those involved (the CIA, Mossad, Sharon
and those complicit in the Bush Administration,
(based on his behavior, my money is on Paul Wolfowitz)
to push the theme that bin Ladin was responsible and that
this aggressive war to overthrow the Taliban is the only
immediate appropriate reaction  --  since, the spin goes,
the Afghans are responsible for "harboring" bin Laden and
that "harboring is exactly the same as terrorism" and that
for that reason the entire Afghan government must be
terminated (must be "ended as a state" to use Wolfowitz's
revealing phrasing of September 12.)

The frame-up has all sorts of collateral benefits for the
perpetrators.  Now the perpetrators can tell the unsuspecting
that bin Ladin's guilt has been established beyond doubt --
that for the sake of the security and safety of Israel and
the United States that it is necessary that the impression of
an "open and shut case" must be spun.    (The  news media
is exhorted to be patriotic and exemplary "wartime correspondents"
and sets about selling the blaming of  bin Ladin and advocating
war and overthrow in Afghanistan --  because they have been
deceitfully led to  believe they  really know who bombed the
buildings; and among the elite of the news publishers,
they "know" it is in the best interests of Israel and Wall Street
that this be the response, that this be the spin.

And Mr. Bush and Mr. Blair each benefit enormously, politically.

And trillions of dollars are enough to subdue and suppress
criticism of the investigation  --  after all, who would know better than
the CIA and Mossad exactly who is responsible?  (The fact has
been reported -- in a different context, of course --  that the U.S.
intelligence receives all of its ground intelligence from Central Asia
through Mossad's network of infiltrator spies -- in other words,
whatever "proofs" the U.S. has (and has shown Tony Blair and NATO)
has come exclusively through Sharon via Mossad.  The "evidence"
so-called, thus, is no counterweight to this reconstruction of the crime.
The "evidence" comes exclusively from the prime "frame-up" suspect.

Has Mossad done this kind of thing before?  Remember
the USS Liberty, an American ship with flag flying,
deliberately attacked and sunk (in multiple attack waves)
with efforts to kill every sailor aboard -- either to destroy
information that the ship may have intercepted or to
frame Arab states to gain the support of American
public opinion.  (There are other cases involving the
blowing up of a disco dance nightclub, again to frame
targeted enemies -- a case actually brought to light
by the non-renegade "good side" Mossad.

The coverup apparently has unlimited resources.  Two
Mossad men caught red handed days after the WTC
crashbombings, were carrying explosive charges and
detonation controls  in the government chambers of the
Mexican legislature?  Apparently big bribes have been,
because these men have been set free.

One surmises that appeals are made to the bodey man
of a "destabilizing international crisis" is the truth were
to get out.  This is ancient cloak of deviant ruling elites.

How many readers -- even if they strongly suspect that
this reconstruction fits the facts -- would not deny the
conclusion anyway because of fear of what this fact would
do to Israel's reputation and thus to her security and survival?

Yet this view may be wrong.  If   Israeli's on the "good side"
were to arrest Sharon and chase down the renegades of
the Mossad "dark side" and bring them to justice --
tensions in the Mideast would dissolve, and good-faith
restored  --  good faith that will never return to the world
as long as the greatest terror frame-up in history is not
corrected by justice and the truth.

Also, if this reconstruction is valid, then that certainly
raises the likelihood that Ariel Sharon was also the
man who gave the order for the murder of Yhitzak Rabin.
Israel's greatest peacemaker (if that title does not go to
Began for his treaty with Sadat.)

Conviction of Sharon would mean that the warmongering
"take-no-prisoners" school of Zionism would at last be
discredited and that the humanitarian way of Rabin
could again be given another chance --  with
the Palestinians gaining restored faith in Israel to be
fair and just after seeing Sharon removed and brought
to justice.

I know that at this point you are poised to throw the
usual tomatoes and call me a "loon" and a "nazi" --  but
I know that those who call me those names are themselves
fearful that this analysis may be right..  (ANd I forgive
you in advance for having to through those tomatoes
out of loyalty and not knowing what else to do in your

It is a rotten world all around -- but my advice is
to seek the truth wherever it leads and then to enforce
justice  -- justice against the real authors of the Sept 11 terror,
whoever they may be  -- to go after  Sharon just as strenuously
as you were recently ready to hunt down bin Laden.

And of course, the United States has a similar house cleaning
of its topmost shelves of power and influence -- a job that we
have been putting off since the 1870's. (How the entire world will
benefit from that job!)

(And I should make this clearer:  The media are not silent because
they are conmplicit in the terror -- they are silent because they
are "yes men" who "know where their bread is buttered" and they
are not about to jump up and say "Sharon did it" until they see
others in their positions doing so.  This is consistent with today's
"Dilbert" world of Establishment-monopolized organizations.
Only an earth shaking event, like the exposing of the Establishment's
role in the WTC terror, will shake down this system.)

Now, let's discuss this intelligently.

Dick Eastman -
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible toevery other man.


Afghanistan War Planned Months Before 911 Suicide Air Attack



Government Had Prior Knowledge - Pending 9-11 Attack

     ---- Patrick Henry