WANTA COMMENTS

6/25/2007 6:47:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time

Leo Wanta - 'The 27.5 Trilllion Dollar Man

-------------------------------------------------------------

6/24/2007 11:05:50 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time

Kent, Here is some info off of GLP

During the week ending 15th June 2007, ‘unspecified very senior officials’ in the United States were arrested and jailed without bail, in connection with corrupt financial operations exploiting the financial assets belonging to Ambassador Sir Leo Emil Wanta (1) as sole Principal.

The former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Dr Alan Greenspan, who was in office when these illegal and corrupt financial scandals to the severe detriment of the American people, the US Treasury and the Ambassador were embarked upon, is among those in jail, and has likewise been refused bail. This is only the beginning of the belated sensational consequences of Wantagate.

SIR LEO FILES FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS IN FEDERAL COURT

On 18th June, the Ambassador filed a Writ for Mandamus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The case Number is: Civil Action # 1-07 CV 609. The text of the filing is given below, minus the Exhibits [see notes at foot of the text]. The Judge in this action has the power to compel payment of the illegally diverted and exploited $4.5 trillion Settlement to the Ambassador/AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc..

A Petition for a Writ of Mandamus is not a normal lawsuit, but presupposes a matter of the gravest consequence. The Judge has latitude to proceed in such a manner as he sees fit. For instance, he has power to order the convening of a Grand Jury, to compel each and every Member of the Bush II Cabinet to appear before him, including the President and the Vice President, to order their prompt compliance with the Court’s demands, and to procure whatever remedies, however severe, that he may deem appropriate."

DIVERSION OF WANTA-OWNED FUNDS REMITTED BY CHINESE

The Petition clarifies that the $4.5 trillion was remitted by the People’s Republic of China. The Chinese authorities remitted the funds after they were made aware that Leo Wanta is not dead, as the CIA had maintained, but had 'ceased to be dead' when the Editor’s $35,000 loan procured the reduction of his illegal probation by five years, in 2005. The funds are the property of Leo Wanta, having been accumulated by him in collaboration with his late partner, Howie Kwong Kok, who died suddenly after ingesting rat poison in Singapore shortly after a visit there by George Bush Sr.

Howie, Leo Wanta’s Chinese partner, had had an argument with Sr., who maintained that the funds belonged to him (an illusion that he shares to this day). He has been exposed as the head of the Nazi Continuum ‘Black’ agency based in Dachau, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (so that while Bush Sr. served as Director of Central Intelligence, he was also head of this ‘Black’ covert Nazi Pan-German intelligence organisation, which, unmasked by this service, remains the primary source of the world’s troubles today).

The Chinese authorities and People’s Bank officials specified that the $4.5 trillion was payable to the Ambassador, whom they recognise to be the sole owner and Principal of these funds, which was why the Chinese authorities honourably sanctioned their repatriation.

In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein.

This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned settlement agreement.

Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America Richmond, Virginia to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at CITIBank New York, New York as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the People’s Republic of China referenced above.

This “Chip” (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond. The Chip transfer did not remove the name of Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China. The transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al account at CITIBank put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner without the authorization of United States Treasury”.

In layman’s language, Treasury Secretary Paulson adopted the false position that the funds belonged to the Chinese authorities, proceeding effectively to treat them as ‘fair game’ and to confiscate (steal) and exploit them on the basis that they are China’s funds (not Leo Wanta’s) – choosing to overlook the fact that the Chinese, as the remitters of the funds, had specifically designated the assets for the Ambassador as beneficiary (since the Chinese acknowledge that these assets belong to him as exclusive Principal, and have belonged to him throughout the 14 years of his ‘takedown’), and that the funds are designated and tagged in Leo Wanta’s name and that of his Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 6/21/2007 7:20:15 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time

Hello Kent,

The best article I have seen in hardcopy regarding Mr. Wanta appeared in the Idaho Observer.

I believe it was Jan 07 issue .

I think I have it laying around somewhere (probably in the outhouse) as there's a guy up here who gets me a copy every month.

Oh, hey, wait a minute (ctrl+n) ........here's the link to the article as it appears on their website.

http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20070119.htm

Was wondering if there was some connection to the "superdollar" counterfeiting scheme involving N. Korea, Russia, and China.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

www.pyrogliphix.com

----------------------------------------------------------

7/7/2007 5:18:44 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time

From: KENT

Wellll, about this judge, Presiding Judge: District Judge T. S. Ellis III

Resume:

http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/tGetInfo?jid=703

Cases:

Judge Clears Contractor of Fraud in Iraq

U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III in Alexandria said there was no evidence that Custer Battles, a firm started by Army veterans Scott Custer and Michael Battles, committed fraud under a $16.8 million contract to provide security at the Baghdad International Airport in 2003.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/08/AR2007020801871.html

Lawsuit Against CIA Is Dismissed

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/18/AR2006051802107.html

U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III in Alexandria acknowledged that Masri "has suffered injuries" if his allegations are true and that he "deserves a remedy." Sources have said Masri was held by the CIA for five months in Afghanistan because of mistaken identity. Masri says he was beaten, sodomized and repeatedly questioned about alleged terrorist ties.

But Ellis said the remedy cannot be found in the courts. Masri's "private interests must give way to the national interest in preserving state secrets,'' the judge wrote in dismissing the lawsuit filed last year against former CIA director George J. Tenet and 10 unnamed CIA officials.

Please note Judge Ellis has formerly defended cases with issues involving "national security"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T.S._Ellis,_III

----------------------------------------------------------

7/7/2007 6:04:23 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time

you are correct but we are not worried.

WORLD COURT and INTERPOL are involved and there are 3,500 arrest warrants in USA..................ROCKY and BUSHWINKLE and DARTH VADAR have finally "pissed off " the wrong people :

CHINA , RUSSIA , EU , and the QUEEN.

...............and SH & GF may "clean house"

before any "show trial"................

stay tuned >>>>>>next weeks and months

----------------------------------------------------------

7/8/2007 7:48:23 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time

based on who this judge in my opinion in all likelihood this case will go absolutely no where just like the others.

----------------------------------------------------------

Subject: the wanta petition for mandamus is 65 pages long

Date: 7/8/2007 8:10:40 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time

Kent, what you have up on your website is only a fraction of what was actually filed. We are obtaining a full copy of the 65 page petition and will furnish it to you upon receipt.

-------------------------------------------------------

Subject: PDF of entire Wanta petition

Date: 7/16/2007 2:41:19 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time

UPDATE: PDF of entire Wanta petition, Federal District Court Filings

-------------------------------------------------------

7/17/2007 12:40:15 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time

Hi,

First, anyone with an account with the PACER system of the federal courts (as all litigation law firms have) can get a copy of this or any other document filed with the federal courts for pennies a page, directly downloaded to one's computer unless the court ordered the documents to be sealed for some reason.

Second, I am vaguely aware of this guy's claims and what others say about him. The court document seems to be somewhat incoherent and meandering to me. While there may be something to this guy's allegations, it is difficult to discern a clear picture of what happened from these documents. This fellow has been convicted of fraud in some Midwestern state (Wisconsin?) and has had a host of other legal difficulties. Now, of course, those could be the result of large forces in our government moving against him, but the incoherent tone of this document makes one wonder if this is just his effort at obscurantism with the vague hope of some sort of gain or delay of the legal inevitable with respect to his illegal activities. One simply cannot tell from this document what one is to believe. I wish that I could offer more sage insights into this matter, but I cannot.

Keep up the fight,

----------------------------------------------------

8/1/2007 8:23:24 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time

Hi Kent,

This is more opinion than evidence, because I cannot remember where I read
the story about Sheikh Yamani. This story claimed that Sheikh Yamani
(then in charge of OPEC) had stated fairly recently that he had been asked
by the US to increase Saudi Arabian oil production, because this lowered
the world price of oil and thus made it harder for the USSR to pay for its
food imports. This request/order from the US must have been after the
second oil price hike of around 1979. (The first was 1973, as you will
remember.)

The Soviets were then told that they would have to abandon central
economic planning ("communism") or their growing foreign exchange debts
would be called in. In other words they were told that they would be
bankrupted. They could not face the problem and appeared to hope that it
would somehow go away. It did not.

Moving on to my own take on this apparent story from Sheikh Yamani, under
Gorbachev (1985-1991) they tried one last attempt at reform (those of the
1950s, 1960s, and 1970s had all failed, owing in part to internal
opposition from diehards who wanted things to stay as they were). When
they could no longer pay their debts, the die-hards tried a coup against
Gorbachev that failed (as we all know). This was because the US was
already advising Yeltsin (as we did not know at the time) and the coup
failed. Yeltsin already knew that it was safe when he famously stood on
the tank defying the anti-Gorbachev forces. This put Yeltsin on the world
stage, in the process discrediting Gorbachev and allowing Yelstin to take
over as the Soviet Union collapsed, or rather was brought down by
instability induced by foreign debt.

All I can say is that it was well known in the UK how much trouble the
Soviet Union was in, during 1990. There were academic conferences
discussing this.

So with this debt-induced collapse, augmented by counterfeit US dollars
that were put into circulation at the time, one did not need trillions of
dollars to bring about the collapse of the Soviet Union. (When Russia
after the collapse became aware of the counterfeit US dollars in their
country, they issued a public statement refusing to accept dollars with
certain numbers on them, so these dollars became worthless in Russia.)

My conclusion is that the Leo Wanta story cannot be true since Reagan and
then Bush had no need to spend a cent to bring down the USSR. It was
brought down ultimately by its continued refusal to reform its own
economy, and in particular its institutionalised refusal to reform
agriculture and increase food production, a pattern that was set at the
time of forced collectivisation from 1930 onwards. The amount of money
mentioned is simply far too much to have been necessary, by several orders
of magnitude.

----------------------------------------------------

Well by gum there is a bonafide court case

PDF of entire Wanta petition, Federal District Court Filings

http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/Documentwanta.pdf

Presiding Judge: District Judge T. S. Ellis III

Resume: http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/tGetInfo?jid=703

Truthfully I'm lost when it comes to Economics, law and other similar games of stud Poker.--Kent