Safe & Sound

User ID: 12608

8/12/2005

3:42 pm EDT

I can´t say one hundred percent that the West Coast won´t be a target, only that it hasn´t been subject to the kind of intensive reconnaissance seen in NYC. I´ve heard folks bounce Houston and Detroit off the wall but nothing I´m getting is pointing in that direction either.

The plan is to close America temporarily for business. They need to hang that sign outside of the store before they do any housecleaning and pull all international debt and deficit obligations. Wall Street must take a hit. The entire financial sector is being targeted logistically, but not without warning to all the major corporates. The hit will only take out the physical infrastructure, not outsourced IT storage and credit records (although some of that data may be selectively and "accidentally" destroyed too). The damage, which will be very real, will nonetheless be symbolic and shocking enough to put America on a 1940s-style war footing.

After that, it´s just a matter of "pick your enemy" and let ´em have it, while The Technicians are enjoying the sun and girls on a nice little island some place out in the Pacific.

----------------------------------------------------

it´ll be big enough, based on what we know.

As for timing, Panchet´s last known residence was in New Jersey, but he´s gone to ground. Riley entered the United States on a Mexican charter three weeks ago and we don´t know where he is. We´ve asked and nobody knows Stateside. That´s why I´m warning of attacks; and the three dates I gave you correspond to a number of criteria, such as reccy-time, impact study, proof-of-concept, and flight-out.

If it was just a case of Riley alone, I would say someone important is about to meet their maker. But with Panchet and Lehrmann figured into the equation it looks like fireworks. Don´t forget: the last time Lehrmann worked his boys Stateside, a couple of skyscrapers vanished.

----------------------------------------------------

actually getting the message out in a public forum such as this does help. A fellow such as myself (and Dreamcatcher knows this) who blows the whistle on the Company is often circumvented by a little phonecall casting aspersions on his integrity. In fact, I believe they don´t even bother to do that these days.

As for housecleaning and martial law, that´s why I´m now over here and not over there.

----------------------------------------------------

>>There´s no more oil to steal.<<

There´s much more oil to steal. They just don´t have enough grunts to do it -- yet. They´ll be flooded with applications by people unlucky enough to find a secure food zone.

When I was in training, they showed us some of the material they had filmed to be broadcast over the networks after the "nuclear event". It was made to look real -- happy Americans grateful for food security in their allotted zone, no riots, no looting ... just lots of friendly, happy soldiers patting kiddies on the head and sister Sue getting a big wet kiss from G.I. Joe. But, hey, they were all actors.

I´m sure they´ve changed the script to bring it into the 21st Century and have gotten some out-of-work Hollywood losers to play those parts. And you´ll believe them. They´ll probably be talking about the need to play straight with the government and go to the zone selected for you, and for sure they´ll be using the term "al Qaida" quite a lot.

You won´t see folks offering resistance or organizing themselves into independent communities away from government control. You´ll just see happy, shiny people COOPERATING and doing what they´re told to do -- and lots of young people signing up for military service, handing out the reward of all those extra food packets to their families.

I know this. In my day, America was a few major companies and a million and one mom & pop stores. Now it´s about five or six mega-corporations, all of whom own the US government and all of whom will survive, no matter what happens to the US continent.

----------------------------------------------------

>>If you cannot be more specific.....then I say this is BS. I am Very Close to someone who is a "Bigshot" at a Fortune 100 Company. As a matter of fact.....this person is literally in charge of all of this company´s "outsourced IT storage and credit records" worldwide.<<

Lucky you. Your friend will either become even more of a bigshot, or just shot. :-)

Apart from that, I can´t help you, lady. What do you want me to do? Advise your friend to take a rain check on a sunny day? If he isn´t based in NYC, then he´s safe. If not, he should consider phoning in sick.

----------------------------------------------------

No one´s blogging something that hasn´t yet happened, although plenty of people know.

But don´t hold your breath. I was one of the first people to finger Ames for selling out to the Russians, and that was back in 1987. At that point we´d lost four assets in Moscow and elsewhere. I personally flew out to Rome in the middle of my vacation and told Jack Devine to his face and showed him the evidence I had, and you know what he said? He said, "Show it to an anlayst." I told him I was an analyst, and he then suggested I show it to an analyst Stateside because of "cultural differences."

I filed my report to base, and waited. And waited. By the time Ames was arrested over SIX YEARS LATER, we officially lost another six assets. Unofficially that figure was MUCH HIGHER, coming in at 24 bodies. If the Company had acted on the information I had, twenty lives would have been spared.

What went wrong? Devine called me "bitter and twisted" and with a personal grudge against Ames. Webster just read the memo and passed over my submission, delegating my debrief to a nobody who left the agency at short notice for a business venture, taking MY DATA with him.

So you can see why I´m not exactly brimming with confidence in our "protectors". Am I not right?

----------------------------------------------------

>>Show some backbone. Don´t be a spineless jellyfish! Be Specific!<<

I don´t know how much more specific I can be based upon the limited information I have at hand. If I could tell you exactly where Riley and Panchet are right now, I would. I have however given you dates based upon an assessment of their field operations - IF those operations are typical of past hits in South America.

I no longer rely upon the FBI for any information attached to the United States. If you really want to know what´s going on in Washington or New York, you talk to a foreign intelligence officer with people on the ground there. You talk to the French or the Germans. They knew what was happening weeks before 9-11 changed America for the worse and they did warn Bush and Cheney, even mindful of the fact that Bush Senior had a hand in events.

Even if you just spend time chatting with a middle ranking desk officer at Interpol, you´ll learn more about organized criminality in the US than you will talking to an FBI staffer.

Now we have this bizarre situation where a listed terrorist, Haroon Rashid Aswat, the alleged mastermind of the London bombings (cough, cough), flies into London unchecked ("Have a nice day, sir") and is given a free taxi ride back to his home courtesy of Her Majesty the Queen, while the US Attorney General is waving an extradition order in Blair´s face -- and Blair laughs, and does nothing.

At the same time, Interpol has been begging the US government to arrest both Panchet and Riley on ANYTHING they can make stick until the French and Belgians get a chance to interview them. Now, we´re not talking about small time murderers; we´re talking about men who assassinate heads of state and blow up skyscrapers. And the Attorney General sees Interpol flapping, laughs in their faces, and DOES NOTHING.

This is how tragedies happen.

----------------------------------------------------

it´s called the "economic imperative": that´s the latest catchphrase used within this milieu.

Something went terribly wrong for the Bush administration: Venezuela. Chavez wasn´t meant to happen. The US lost around 2 billion in laundered bribes because the instigators of the anti-Chavez coup simply took the money and ran. :-)

That was kitty money for a rainy day, and the golden rule is that all future operations are financed on the back of the last. Had the revolution/coup worked out in Venezuela, we may have been having this discussion last summer.

----------------------------------------------------

that´s my main fear. Not so much suitcase nukes, but rather transportable nukes that can pack a 50-kiloton punch.

Back in 1996, an ONI officer, returning from a month-long seminar in Israel, reported Israeli Military Intelligence (A´man) as saying that "at least" three transportable nukes were on American soil. A´man didn´t specify where they were located or under whose command these weapons were assigned.

Last year, under the auspices of the British Ministry of Defense, the SAS actually carried out a classified mock exercise in Scotland in which a "suitcase nuke" was "detonated" in an urban center. Panchet was there. He participated.

----------------------------------------------------

In answer to some of the comments above, I´m an American citizen, not a German citizen.

----------------------------------------------------

why don´t you elaborate on what your "friends" have told you and why you now think there is credence to Safe & Sound´s story?

----------------------------------------------------

I´ve just taken a trip around this forum, and I do see why some of you have hang-ups about hoaxers. I can assure you that I´m not one of them. On the contrary, I would suggest the immediate arrest of anyone hoaxing information based upon a notional terror attack. It´s illegal, and for good reason.

----------------------------------------------------

Ranger-X,

Michael PANCHET

Height: 5´ 10"

Weight: 145 pounds

Eyes: Brown

Hair: Dark brown, straight, fashionably cropped

Features: Roman nose, suntanned, mole r. of chin

Style: Bespoke, Italian, chic

Panchet is good-looking, dresses very Saville Row. He´s a sex addict too. He has plenty of girlfriends, but tells them nothing of his work other than his saying he´s an investment scout. He operates well from behind paper companies financed by John Bredenkamp, among others. In Europe, he´s wanted for questioning in connection with fraud and terrorism. Officially, he still works for MI6 (British CIA).

Don RILEY

Height: 5´ 6"

Weight: 155 pounds

Eyes: Blue

Hair: Reddish, quite long, unkempt

Features: Squat nose, Irish-looking

Style: Jeans, sneakers, cheap anoraks

You´d miss him in a crowd. Unlike Panchet, he has no charisma. He looks like any Joe and you wouldn´t guess he´s a born killer, a psychopath. He´s wanted in Europe for rape and also for the murder of Olaf Palme. He lives in Chile in a very large gated community in Valparaiso. He also has two children by a previous wife in Argentina.

----------------------------------------------------

PLEASE GO TO PAGE THREE