retiredafb (6 days ago)

Please tell me which seconds you see "apollo 11" on this film? Craters shown are recognizable. The dsky shows Verb 15 noun 05 prog 34. Interferences, marks on the lem window are not subject of any comment, it would be strange not to find them

(Reply)

Jukebox1234 (6 days ago)

00:02... blue screen, white letters...

(Reply)

retiredafb (6 days ago)

you'r right, wrong title, should not be this one, but compare the video to apollo 11 or other missions, you won't ever ever find this moon flyover , craters lutke and delporte, compare the coordinates given on a lunar map . Only apollo 15 and 17 passed right over these craters before, and this film is not one of these mission. I ll ask to make realize another film on the apollo 15 and 17 flyover, you'll be able to compare.

(Reply)

shiv68 (6 days ago)

This is a great video

(Reply)

retiredafb (6 days ago)

But this particular mission brought to earth new tech and bio artefacts.

The skies of Germany in 1945, saw the first "mama ships" coming in the middle of the boxes. B17' cameras made good shots of them. Later, the R/D department of the pentagon transferred technologies to Bell laboratories, DuPont de Nemours and others. A lot of retired persons like me , write, publish. These things can seem ridiculous, like a man walking on the moon in 2007, but it was our job.

(Reply)

retiredafb (6 days ago)

Most of the people now have no technical culture. I'm not surprised that people claim that mankind didn't go to the moon. Pictures of men walking on the moon are pictures who come from the future (for the youngest generations) and from the past. The illusion of progress associated with time...

The Apollo tapes show that it was possible better things, with ambition and ingeniosity. For me the most beautiful heritage of Apollo are pictures from the earth.

(Reply)

retiredafb (6 days ago)

I refuse to answer to any revisionist comment , the same type of comment that can be found on the "apollo hoax subjects". About apollo 20 cancellation, consider that nasa claimed that the lm-15 was destructed . A billion dollar LM put to scrap? I'm amazed how lie become truth when printed on a wikipedia page. I would like to have the proof of intelligence lifeform on earth sometimes.

I'm not active on newsgroups, i just put references sometimes, i read them a lot, but i'm sick of that.

(Reply)

retiredafb (6 days ago)

hello to all viewers, i answer to everybody by mail. I didn't want to post here but;

I live in Rwanda since 1994. The government provides me protection and discrecy, but digitizing and video treatment is poor here, so, don't be offended.The crew patch video made 90mb the first time, the team here didn't knew what a codec was, so only 4seconds 90mb 758-576 was posted. Same problems with subtitles, choice of a codec, format.

(Reply)

Jukebox1234 (6 days ago)

To the author, clarify this: WHY we all see "Apollo 11" on the starting film, then right before the ship scene appears, we got a very convenient "interference" (so you could put the "fake" scene after the first one, probably real from Apollo 11). The question is: WHY you waste your time doing such a fake? I mean... haven't you anything better to do with your time?

(Reply)

asdffd (6 days ago)

Should I watch this video or is it going to be a waste of my time? I believe in UFOs but the wacky conspiracy shit is a waste of time. Is that what this is? Thanks.