Planet X / 12th Planet Independent Report By: Charlie
Parker
7/11/02 9:14:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time
(Planet X / 12th Planet)
Another Coverup?
5-27-2
I am not one to take information lightly. By that I mean, if I am told something I have an obligation to check out that information for some factual basis before passing it on. I have read the 12th Planet and other books by Z. Stichen. Dr. Stichen is not some loony out in left field. Much of his information is based on accumulated fact. If it were not based on fact, he would be writing science fiction. Lately I have been forwarding information to friends stating the 12th Planet is again inbound to our solar system. The articles are many. I do not propose that you as a reader accept any of it as fact. You have an obligation to yourself to do your own research.
In the last few weeks or so I have conducted my own research into fact or fiction of this subject. I am not asking anyone to accept what I have found, do your own homework, I am passing on to you what I have found, make you own conclusions. My first objective is to read what is available. After forming a reasonable picture, the next step is to ask some questions from 'the people that are in the know' so to speak. As of this writing, I have contacted six observatory's, only one has responded and it is the: South African Astronomical Observatory: enquiries@saao.ac.za , the observatories which have not responded are:
University of California, Lick Observatory:
Keck Observatory, Hawaii
Apache point Observatory:
Royal Observatory, Greenwich:
Observatory, University
of Helsinki, Finland
Karri.Muinonen@Helsinki.Fi
The following conversation is between myself (Charlie Parker), and Case Rijsdijk of the South African Astronomical Observatory:
Charlie P.:
Hi,
I am trying to find photos and tracking information of the inbound 12th Planet / Planet X. If none are available from your organization, can you direct me to anyone who has this material?
Case:
Charlie,
There
is no inbound planet X. Your best bet is to try the Internet
Kind regards
Case
Charlie:
Case,
Is that the'official' position?
Thanks again.
Charlie
Case:
Mon, May 20, 2002:
Hi
Charlie,
My personal one - and probably
supported by most astronomers until such time as someone can supply proper
scientific evidence to support the existence of Planet X. Do you have any?
If you do I would love to see it.
Kind regards
Case
Charlie:
Case,
Thanks for writing back, again. I have followed this on and off since the 90's. If it is alright with you we'll start here:
http://www.crawford2000.co.uk/nibiru_latest.htm
http://www.crawford2000.co.uk/nibiru.htm
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20010702/kuiper.html
I have more, I did not write this stuff, your associates in the field did. Please note there are articles from the Washington Post, Discovery.com (Discovery Channel), etc. It would be helpful if you would point that big toy you use in the direction given in the articles. I will send more after you have read these if you like. Maybe we can both learn something...and have some fun stirring up things a little.
Thanks,
Charlie
Charlie:
Case,
Below are the latest. If you can calculate the trajectory of it based on previous coordinates you should see it.
Thanks, Charlie
Hi Charlie,
I think you are wrong here - no colleagues of mine would even begin to look at this stuff, let alone write about it! I have not yet seen an article in any peer reviewed scientific journal! Quite frankly I have better things to do than to waste time "stirring things up a little"!
Kind regards
Wed., May 22, 2002
Case .
Hi Charlie,
Do you realy believe this stuff?
Kind regards
Case
Charlie:
On
Wed, 22 May 2002, Charlie P.
wrote:
Case,
It is not a matter of what you or I believe. People can
‘believe’ whatever they wish to believe.
Researchers and scientist work with, and establish, a factual basis, which
leads to a reasonable conclusion. If this is in fact a bunch of B.S.
than it should be proven so. If it is not, than some attention should be
paid, don’t you think?
Case:
Charlie,
The trouble is that the people who "research" this stuff are not creditable scientists; if they were they would publish in mainstream journals! Something that is patently untrue does not need to be disproved - rather the other way round - provide scientific evidence and mainstream science will certainly take note!
Charlie:
Wed. May 22,
2002
Case,
If I understand what you are telling me, everything that has been written by creditable people is a lie, right?
Case:
No that is not what I said - see above.
Charlie:
Case,
I have written to six observatories; you were the only one kind enough to answer, I appreciate that. From my side, it looks to me like another cover-up. All I am asking for is for someone to back it up or blow it out. If there is some other reason, (i.e. political, etc) I understand.
Case:
Wed. May 22,
2002
Oh no - not the conspiracy theory - again!! Maybe you should talk to Graham Hancock! The other six were right!!
Charlie:
Wed.
May 22,
2002
The global impact of something like this is hard to imagine. It would be
irresponsible for anyone at this point in time to release this information
to the overall public. Those who already know will deal with it. It serves
no purpose to panic the world and I have no intention of doing so. If you
have superiors who forbid you to investigate this, fine. Just let me know.
Telescopes, as far as I know, are now computer controlled. It
doesn’t take that long to punch in the coordinates and
take a peak.
Charlie
Case:
Wed.
May 22, 2002
Charlie,
There is no object
that is going to impact the Earth within the foreseeable future - yes there
are plenty of things out there beyond Pluto and in the Kuiper belt - 20,000
in fact, but only 108
are at present in a known Earth crossing orbit and none of those are a
threat. There is no point in
looking at something that isn't there! It's just a waste of time.
Cheers Charlie.
Kind regards
Case
Charlie:
On Thu, 23 May
2002,
Case,
I did not say the 12th Planet would hit earth, it will pass between the earth
and the sun, you misread what
I wrote. I am sending some more articles, may I suggest you print out hard
copies and take them home to read this weekend. I need to finish this news
story; time is money and all that... Our conversation is archived and I will
quote you. I need some serious answers not stonewalling.
Please read the following:
http://www.noao.edu/outreach/press/pr01/pr0110.html
http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2001/phot-27-01.html
Thanks again,
Charlie
Case:
Charlie,
This is what I
like about you guys - you never come out and say who you are, where you operate
from, what you do etc, etc. Some personal details appreciated! Final words
- I simply do not buy into unscientific speculation! KBO's and TNO's are
not new - yes for those doing planetary science these are interesting objects
- the problem starts when alternative sciences and their supporters (like
you?) twists the facts!
Kind regards
Case
.
2001 KX76 (Planet X -12th Planet
- Nibru) news hit mainstream media in early / mid 2001. Initially Planet
X was dubbed a planet. Soon after first public reports Planet X was downgraded
to a 'large astriod' (Planet X is 4 times larger than earth). Presumably
this was done to keep public nervousness to a minimum. Now, less than a year
later, I cannot find an observatory willing to talk about or release information
regarding this planet. As you can see from the above conversation, the
astronomers are either stonewalling or refuse to answer any
questions.
In the above conversation Mr. Rijsdijk went from 'I would love to see it' to 'just a waste of time'. Now, I'm not a rocket scientist but if I'm not mistaken that was a change of gears if ever I saw one. As you can also see, the conversation terminated as soon as Mr. Rijsdijk realized that I was referring to 2001 KX76. Mr. Rijsdijks' first note to me says, "There is no inbound Planet X", a lie? For someone who is in the business of finding new planets it seems as though he and others are just not interested? To work at an observatory and have an, 'I could care less ' attitude is like having a race car that you never race. So why, exactly, are you there if it is not to find new planets and tell the world? Even when I sent press releases from observatories Mr. Rijsdijk still avoided 2001 KX76 as "unscientific speculation". Lastly, where did I "twist the facts"? My only objective was to ask questions and get confirmation and any other facts relative to 2001 KX76.
For those of you who are skeptical, try writing an observatory. Ask them for any updates on 2001 KX76. The observatories will not release the trajectory, coordinates or speed of Planet X. Nothing, nada, zip. If anyone gets an answer, please let us all know. I did find one article that said we could see Planet X in October of 2002 using binoculars: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/solar_system/features/ceres.html#
Maybe we should all just wait til' October and see for ourselves. I will be wondering then what disinformation, doublespeak and misdirection will occur at that point in time?
Research Articles worth reading:
http://www.crawford2000.co.uk/nibiru_latest.htm
http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2001/phot-27-01.html#phot-27b-01
http://yowusa.com/Archive/February2002/02FEB02a/02feb02a.htm
http://www.rumormillnews.net/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=12743
http://jassekhmet.tripod.com/nibirum.htm
http://www.zetatalk.com/poleshft/p00.htm
If this is not enough for you, I suggest you do a word search using: 2001 KX76, 12th Planet, Planet X, Nibru. The information is out there you just have to do a little hunting. Mainstream media reported Planet X / 12th Planet as far back as Jan. 30, 1983.
Discovery News reported Planet X:
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20010702/kuiper.html
New York Times, Jan 30, 1983:
http://www.crawford2000.co.uk/news.htm
There is one other interesting thing I had noticed. From early January of 2001 through mid August 2001 Planet X was picking up steam in mainstream media. The news of a very large inbound planet was becoming a concern to many. The effect of this news could prove to be problem to say the least.
If anyone has seen the movie Swordfish or Wag The Dog you will understand the meaning of misdirection of attention. This very same misdirection occurred on Sept 11, 2001. Since then Shadow Government has gotten a very large chunk of money also. Think it's a shot in the dark? Maybe, but then, maybe not. I have not made any conclusions as of this writing and for the time being studying the material available seem to be yours and my only option. If Planet X is, in fact, inbound than it is up to you to make choices.
Good luck.....