Date: 6/17/01 9:51:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time
(Harry Mason)

Dear Kent et al,
The image showing a McVeigh "Clone" at the WACO Branch Davidian trial sure looks like McVeigh..............
Let us assume (probably with a 99% certainty as far as I can tell) that it is McVeigh who was photographed at the WACO trial.
Question is who ID'ed him as an ATF agent ??? Or did McVeigh just visit the trial as part of his personal interest in the entire sorry WACO affair, and was then mis ID'ed by someone ??? Exactly who labelled him as an ATF man ??? I am informed that the picture and label were published in the "Soldier of Fortune" magazine.
However whatever the outcome I am personally certain this man was got at a la Manchurian Candidate - his first TV appearances showed an absolute zombie. He certainly believes he "bombed" the OKC Building - but that don't make it so !!!
I checked out the McVeigh trial transcript and was amazed there was no discussion or evidence of the type of explosives used nor the damage pattern that occurred there. This was especially interesting to me as I had gone out of my way to make McVeighs lawyer well aware before the trial, by e-mail, fax, and phone calls, of the evidence about blast damage style and other oddities of this explosion that merited very close examination by the defence........................
Attaching below my own take on this OKC scenario (extract from "Bright Skies" written in 1997) for your interest..............
The causes of the reported pre-explosion electrical and seismic effects still remain unanswered......................
The exact nature of the OKC event has therefore yet to be fully elucidated.
Looks to me like a spin doctor case was assembled from the extant hatred of the US Gov over WACO etc to provide a "plausible story line" - trouble is they have not honestly aired all of the evidence. Not only that amassed by internet investigators but also their own FBI evidence. This pattern of very poor evidence analysis and cencored publication followed by farcical judicial shows runs right through most recent "USA" events from Pan-Am Lockerbie, and WACO through TWA 800, Egypt Air, OKC, etc. etc.
No civilisation can survive intact for long with an obviously very bent and/or totally inept justice system. A recent example being the collapse of the Iron Curtain .............
In Australia we have also suffered from this new "justice" paradigm in the recent case of the Tasmanian Port Arthur multiple killings. 
Normal justice systems would call a mistrial and then retrial anyone where the national police force witheld (or mislaid) hundreds-thousands of reports on the issue. But in the USA McVeigh is rushed obscenely to execution, whilst here in OZ the Port Arthur trial rejects hearing copious evidence from victims that points to multiple gun men and not one lone nutter. The excuse given in OZ was that it would be criminal to put the survivors through the terror again, - or they just ignored calling witnesses who had given depositions that did not fit the lone gunman scenario. 
The evidence in most of these cases tends to point towards very high tech weaponry terrorist attacks against the general population. By whom and for what purpose is still open but there are plenty of leads.
One thing is certain - our governments seem to be working very hard to keep the true nature of these events from the public.
Harry Mason
Perth Western Australia

OKLAHOMA CITY "BOMBING"    (extracted from "Bright Skies" 1997)

On 19th. April 1995, at a few minutes after 9.00 am, Oklahoma City was blasted by the "terrorist bombing" of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. One hundred and sixty eight men, women and children were killed, and hundreds more were maimed or injured in this callous attack. The building was nearly totally destroyed by the explosion, whilst severe damage was inflicted on adjacent buildings, petering out at about a one-mile radius from ground zero.

This event was soon blamed upon a "right-wing militia group" composed of ex-Gulf War veterans utilising an ANFO bomb composed of from two to five tonnes of ammonium nitrate and Diesel fuel-oil set up in a hire truck parked in front of the target building. A robotic Timothy McVeigh was recently convicted of the OKC "bombing", and his alleged accomplice Terry Nichols awaits his trial (which is about to commence as this article goes to press).

On the day of the event, I, like many others, watched the CNN TV feed of the Oklahoma scene. Intriguingly, there were early reports of missiles being seen coming down vertically into the building, but these reports never resurfaced. A survivor with blood over his face was interviewed about one hour into the rescue effort. He described how his life had been saved by his previous domicile in California. When the Murrah Building began to shake violently he recognised an earthquake, just like those he had experienced in California, so he dived under his fifth-floor desk. Some five-to-ten seconds of shaking later, a huge explosion demolished the building around him, but the desk saved his life.

Then came reports that more bombs had been found, and a utility truck with a small armoured bomb box in its tray was shown, whilst the FBI/Police radio net delivered a conversation alleging large drums of mercury fulminate explosive had been found attached to building support pillars next to the lift shaft.

I became agitated, since I had never heard of earthquake-type effects hitting a building before a bomb went off, and I knew mercury fulminate to be an extremely unstable explosive and very unlikely to have survived a major explosion. Also, the size of explosive drum reported then and later photographed would have been far too large to fit in the armoured bomb box that reportedly drove away with these dangerous prizes.

Explosives experts in Australia, the UK and USA (e.g., the General Partin report) began to question the nature of the damage at OKC.

The gist of their theses is that low-velocity explosives like ANFO cannot have demolished so many support pillars in the strange pattern seen at OKC, since the blast pressure falls off according to the inverse cube distance law.

Yet some near-bomb pillars were still standing, whilst some further away from the bomb were demolished by the blast. Their reports generally invoke a need for very-high-velocity explosives and/or individual charges attached to certain pillars inside the building - requiring hours of work to fit out.

Personal friends with experience in mining explosives and others with military experience of Belfast IRA ANFO terrorist-bomb damage have confirmed these points to me and have noted that the crater that allegedly developed at OKC does not fit with the truck bomb explanation or the truck's alleged parking lot position.

Another possible weapon candidate soon surfaced in the "net media": the "A-Neutronic" bomb. In this scenario, a mad criminal scientist (the infamous Michael Riconosciuto, currently serving time in a US prison), developed for the US Government a new super-weapon that involved blowing a cloud of chemicals into the air, charging the cloud with a large excess of electrostatic energy by means of a small rocket-carried "wire", and then detonating the resultant "fuel-air" mix to create a small nuclear-type explosion.

I began to collect eyewitness reports and evidence from official source publications and Internet sites relating to the OKC event. Then, in late 1996, I visited Oklahoma City and with the help of local author David Hoffman examined the "bombing" site and interviewed local witnesses.

The outpourings of grief and anguish in the messages and card wreaths of the victims' relatives and friends, on the targeted building site's protective fences, made me resolve to give this event my very best analysis - to try to deduce the true nature of this explosive event and thereby help indicate the culprits.

Seismic evidence recorded by local seismometers in OKC demonstrated a double-pronged explosive energy event with two nearly identical three-to-five-second, low-amplitude, multiple wave trains separated by a null field, occurring over a nine-second interval. USGS geophysicists argued that these two wave-packets were due to an initial ground "surface" wave arriving before a secondary wave that had traveled via deeper reflecting Earth layers, i.e., via the local sedimentary rock basement. Other USGS geophysicists argued that there were two wave-packets, representing the "bomb's" explosion followed by the building debris impacting with the ground. An OKC university geophysicist suggested the data indicated two explosions occurred there. I suggest that this seismic evidence can only demonstrate two high energy events occurred at the OKC site - seperated by a few seconds - their exact nature remains uncertain except that at least one had a coincident explosive detonation event.

These USGS hypotheses were literally blown apart by the US Government's explosive demolition action on the Alfred P. Murrah Building remains, which failed completely to demonstrate a two-pronged seismic response that was in any way similar to the original event recordings. The original and best seismic recordings have been confiscated by the FBI, along with many other items of evidence such as the City video-surveillance tapes. Hardly surprisingly, none of this evidence surfaced in the McVeigh trial.

Along with the evidence of seismic action shaking the building some five-to-ten seconds prior to any explosion or blast wave hitting the building, there were several other mysterious immediately pre-explosion events. My source for these eye-witness statements is the OKC Comemorative Volume - published by the City as a memorial to the victims. 

A policeman working at his computer noticed electrical sparks and streamers in the wiring under the table several seconds before the explosion brought the building down around him. A woman on an upper floor noted a strong ionising electrical sensation and hot air-flow entering the windows several seconds prior to the explosion which blew the same windows in on her. The lights in the building went out some five seconds before the explosion. A dictation tape recording made across the street from the "bombed" building recorded a loud "click" a few seconds before it recorded the sound of a huge explosion. This "click" was probably a local electromagnetic wave spike of considerable intensity picked up by the recorder circuitry.

David Hoffman found an eyewitness located in a car a couple of hundred metres from ground zero. She observed a silver-white light flash or beam coming out of the top of the building, followed by a large blue-white electrical arcing flash or beam, followed by an orange-red light flash or beam that shot out from the top of the building.

These electrical and light effects took some five seconds and were immediately followed by a "loud swarm of bees type vibrational noise" which preceded the actual explosion. (Reports of missiles may have been mistaken identification of these pre-explosion energy beams.)

The light flashes with beams and the "swarm of bees noise" were followed immediately by two explosive shock waves, one trailing immediately on the other, that propagated out and away from the base of the building. These waves lifted the ground and buildings violently upwards. David's witness called this the "lid effect". I interviewed people who experienced the outgoing expansion waves, that threw people away from ground zero. They were then immediately followed by return implosion shock waves - that threw the same persons back towards ground zero.

Several cars located on the above-ground carpark (located a couple of hundred metres from ground zero - "protected" behind and "below" the newspaper building) had electronic ignition computers completely burnt out electrically by the event. Two cars in this car park had factory-fitted digital magnetic compasses that were later found to have been thrown out by 180° and 45° respectively. Sherman Skolnick reported that he received info that many nearby office computers went down with burnt-out circuit- boards. These facts point strongly to a major EM pulse having struck the area associated with the explosion. I was able to confirm that PC's in the car park offices had circuit boards burnt out by the event. 

The local area damage from the OKC event was huge. I cannot emphasise enough how devastated this area was. I was quite amazed when I visited the site. Entire blocks of explosion damaged office buildings had been demolished since the event, due to their shattered state, some nearly a mile away from ground zero. Large open spaces, where buildings had existed, were surrounded by boarded-up buildings with no windows, no roofs, and heavily shattered internal concrete beams and supporting pillars. 

I was shown the intense damage inside the newspaper building (which was adjacent to ground zero and the Alfred P. Murray building) - where internal dividing walls had been smashed asunder, and horizontal three-foot-square steel reinforced concrete beams sagged down everywhere. This building had been built to very high 1930s standards to withstand tornadoes, yet it was wrecked. Many buildings had entire windowsills forced back in with their front brick walls sagging inwards.

A building nearer to ground zero, in front of the newspaper building and directly opposite ground zero, with large one-foot-wide floor-and-wall reinforcing steel H-girders which were twisted like spaghetti into grotesque shapes amidst the ruins of entire floors blown away to dust and rubble.

I showed a suite of local damage photos to retired SAS trooper friends, with experience in IRA ANFO bomb damage. They were as amazed as I was, and stated categorically that this was no ANFO damage. They said it would almost not have mattered how large an ANFO bomb had been detonated, it could not have caused the damage seen in the photos and/or described in the US literature.

Funnily, the FBI released film of ANFO car-bomb test explosions that show significant fireball or fiery effects from such explosives. Yet no witnesses have described any fiery explosion or flames -just strange, pre-explosion light flashes or beams, followed by pure energy waves, with very high temperature plasma-type heat effects noted on nearby car paint. Subsequently things caught fire but the actual explosion did NOT involve a fireball.

It is my contention that the OKC event was the result of a double-pronged Tesla type EM weapon strike that caused the Earth's dielectric field to erupt up through the building = the light flashes. The building shook first because of harmonic reaction of the building and bedrock to the first EM wave packet which also blew out the building's electrical supply and created the various computer, digital compass and ionising hot-air effects. Having rocked the building sufficiently to effect severe structural cracking damage, the EM weapon mode was advanced in power and style by a second strike to initiate explosive atomic-bond rupture and literally blow the building material apart.

No conventional or nuclear explosive, including a so-called "A-Neutronic" bomb, can cause seismic shaking and electrical light-energy effects in a structure, several seconds before the explosion blast-wave hits.

Oblique aerial photos of the Murrah Building show two nearly vertical, tubelike damage forms running through the building. These represent slightly displaced near-vertical but divergent beam-pulse orientations, suggesting an orbital or airborne weapons platform was involved in the action.

Any bomb or militia-terrorist character to this event was set in train by those who hit the building, or by the US Government, to ensure that the true nature of the weapon system and its technology was hidden from public, and possibly other US Government personnel, knowledge.

This implies that a faction from within, (or above !), the US Government was responsible. Either that, or the US Government was warned well in advance that this particular building would be hit that day by an advanced weapon over which there was no defence - so it quickly found a patsy and built up a cover story to keep the public in their advanced mental state of "mushroom" .

"Need-to-know" secrecy policy suggests that there then entered a cock-up of horrific dimensions. Lower-level personnel had been searching for a bomb earlier that morning, having been told that the building was targeted for bombing by terrorists, but, in failing to find it, they then did not proceed to evacuate the building. Higher government levels, having decided to hide the horrible truth from even their own operatives, had to have a plausible McVeigh militia-type event on hand. The Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms personnel were better served, as were the Judges in the adjacent court house - they were all warned to stay away that day.

Secret Service personnel engaged in international anti-drug operations were in their offices which lay in the centre of the damage and were wiped out by this OKC event.

Interestingly, similar terrorist- bombing events in the past were apparently aimed at the same anti-drug Secret Service, ie. both the downing of the Lockerbie Pan Am jumbo and the "bombing" of the New York World Trade Centre.

Indeed, it is possible that this entire series of events is being fought over a drugs empire ???


Extracted from Bright Skies Copyright (c) 1997 by Harry Mason