forwarded.......

Dave Hartley
http://www.Asheville-Computer.com
http://www.ioa.com/~davehart


Weird Weather Worldwide Engineering/Modification, Who's ToBlame?Read!
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 23:15:34 -0700
To: Gabriel Herzberg <MountainOfHeart@webtv.net
From: Jim Karnstedt <karnos@sirius.com
Subject: Fwd: Re: Interesting info from Bearden

Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 23:52:42 -0700
From: Jacob Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com
Reply-To: sarfatti@well.com
Organization: Advanced Intelligence Agency
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Tom Bearden (by way of Creon Levit)" <soliton@bellsouth.net
Subject: Re: Interesting info from Bearden

I will show this to Dr. Gennady Shipov and to Professor J. P. Vigier in the
morning and ask for their comments. There is also someone else we will ask.
Tomorrow is an auspicious day for more than one reason.

"Tom Bearden (by way of Creon Levit)" wrote:

 Dear Dr. Evans (Myron):

 My deepest thanks to you for this definitive statement, and my strong
 congratulations to you and your theoretical colleagues for this important
 work you have done.

 Having followed the development of these extreme Russian weapons for two
 decades as best I could, I would like to assure the scientists receiving
 your message that this Russian weapon program started by 1950, and was
 well-underway by the mid-50s.  In January 1960 Khrushchev, speaking to the
 Presidium, referred to such weapons as "fantastic weapons", and as "just
 within the portfolio of our scientists, so to speak."  In short, the
weapons
 were in final development in January 1960.  They are loosely known as
 "energetics" weapons.

 The first large energetics weapons were deployed by the Soviets in 1963.
 They were not yet available - fortunately - during the Cuban Missile
Crisis
 a few months earlier, else that grave confrontation might well have had a
 quite different outcome.

 I personally gathered open reports of hundreds of incidents of testing of
 these Russian weapons.  The power achieved by the weapons is awesome, and
 very much differing from high power microwaves, lasers, and radars.  For a
 hard reference of very good quality (multiple trained witnesses,
 investigation by good scientists of conventional training, etc.),
eyewitness
 reports and the investigation of an enormous event are scientifically
 reported in the following two references (both should be read, as the
second
 contains additional information).

 Walker, Daniel A.; Charles S. McCreery, and Fermin J. Oliveira, "Kaitoku
 Seamount and the Mystery Cloud of 9 April 1984," Science, Vol. 227, Feb.
8,
 1985, p. 607-611.

 McKenna, Daniel L. and Daniel Walker, "Mystery Cloud: Additional
 Observations," Science, Vol. 234, Oct. 24, 1986, p. 412-413.

 In this incident, a "cold explosion" (sharply pulsed creation of
convergent
 EM energy in the interference zone) was created off the Kuril Islands,
above
 the surface of the ocean.  This caused rapid cooling of the localized air,
 and a resulting sudden insurgence of surrounding air.  The result was a
 sharp upwelling of water and vapor sucked up from the surface of the
ocean,
 rising rapidly to about 60,000 feet altitude, then spreading out into a
 large cloud.  Then in the top of that cloud there appeared an intensely
 glowing ball (shell) of light.  This shell of light then slowly and
steadily
 expanded as a sphere, until it reached some 300 miles diameter.  The
 electromagnetic energy in the glowing spherical shell would thus have been
 enormous.  At that time, the center of the sphere was at an altitude of
 about 200 miles.

 This is certainly not a natural phenomenon.  Nature does not make intense
 little stationary balls of light in the tops of clouds, which slowly and
 methodically expand to spheres 300 miles in diameter and remain perfect
 spheres of light.

 This is only one of many dozens of similar reports from around the world.
 Such tests were so regularly observed and reported by airline pilots
flying
 the northern route between Japan to the U.S., that everyone lost interest
 and the pilots mostly ceased reporting them.

 The enormous energy density achieved by these action-at-a-distance weapons
 is particularly significant.

 I personally published citations of many of these reports I found in the
 open literature.

 The weather control referred to by Defense Secretary Cohen is often
achieved
 by using one or more scalar interferometers to produce slow heating in a
 selected small area of the atmosphere, e.g. in a chosen location over the
 United States.  That heating produces air expansion, reduces the air's
 density, and thus produces a "low pressure" area (ground pressure
 measurement).  Simultaneously, at other selected areas, slow cooling over
a
 selected area is produced, resulting in more dense air and therefore a
"high
 pressure" area as measured on the ground.  By slowly moving these highs
and
 lows around, the jet streams can be entrained and deviated - and in fact
 "steered".  By altering and steering the jet streams, one can "steer the
 weather".  On July 4, 1976, apparently as an icon gift from the Russians
for
 our U.S. bicentennial, regular engineering of the weather over North
America
 and the United States was initiated (the first tests were apparently in
 1967).  It is still ongoing.  The Russian weather engineering has also
been
 steadily expanded over the territory of other nations, and has added
cooling
 and heating of selected areas of ocean water as well.  In short, it now
 involves "energy tickling" and thus "temperature alteration" of El Nino
and
 La Nina.

 These weapons cannot be explained by normal U(1) electrodynamics, since
U(1)
 makes the term "scalar interferometry" an oxymoron.  On the other hand,
E.T.
 Whittaker in 1903 and 1904 published definitive work showing that (1) the
 so-called "scalar" potential is actually a bundle of bidirectional
 longitudinal EM waves, and (2) all EM fields, potentials, and waves are
 decomposable into two scalar potential functions (hence into scalar
 interferometry).

 Dr. Evans and the AIAS theorists have just rigorously established the
 technical basis for the Whittaker scalar interferometry.  The
interferometry
 does indeed produce scalar potential gradients and curls in the
interference
 zone, and in the presence of mass such as air, these scalar entities
 interact with the masses to produce ordinary EM fields, waves, energy,
etc.

 Eerily, for over a century scientists have calculated the reaction cross
 section of the scalar potential, never the magnitude of it.  And then we
 have called that reaction cross section the "magnitude of the potential."
 If one examines the definition of the potential, one finds it defined at a
 point as the joules of energy collected (diverged) from those
bidirectional
 waveflows comprising the potential, around a unit point charge assumed at
 that point.  One need only point out that this rigorously is the reaction
 cross section of the potential, not the magnitude of the potential itself.
 The water swirling around a fixed rock in a river, is not the river.  In
the
 ideal conditions, a fixed amount of water is in the "swirl", hence the
 divergence of the water there has a scalar magnitude.  However, the river
 itself is not a scalar entity, but is a vectorial entity.  In the same
 fashion, potential is a multitude of bidirectional rivers.  It is not a
 scalar entity at all, but is a multivectorial entity.  The divergence of
 energy from that potential, at a point, is a scalar value.

 The magnitude of the potential is indefinite.  This can be seen from the
 very simple equation W = (phi)q, where (phi) is the reaction cross section
 of the potential PHI at a 3-space point in diverged/collected joules per
 coulomb, q is the number of diverging/collecting coulombs occupying that
 3-space point, and W is the total number of joules of energy collected by
 the charge q.  As can be seen, even from a very weak potential with a
small
 but nonzero reaction cross section (phi), one can extract as much energy
as
 one wishes, merely by placing sufficient charges q at sufficient 3-space
 points.  From a single microvolt (cross section), e.g., one can collect a
 trillion joules of energy, given sufficient
 intercepting/collecting/diverging charges q.

 So all our textbooks teach us to calculate the multivectorial potential's
 scalar reaction cross section at a point, and call that the "magnitude of
 the potential' at that point - which is a non sequitur.  What is extracted
 from or diverged from an entity, is not the entity itself.

 The O(3) electrodynamics being pioneered by Dr. Evans and others is highly
 significant.  For the first time, scalar interferometry has been expressed
 in proper mathematical terms, and a paper giving this demonstration has
been
 submitted for formal publication.

 I would like to express my deep personal appreciation and congratulations
to
 Dr. Evans and his theoretical colleagues for their strenuous efforts. 
Many
 people throughout the Western world owe them a very great debt for this
 important work, which is vital to the defense of our various nations and
our
 very survival.

 Most sincerely,

 T.E. Bearden, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army (Retired)
 President, CTEC Inc.
 President, American Association of Distinguished American Scientists
 Fellow Emeritus, AIAS.

 -----Original Message-----
 From:   FishnChips [mailto:FishnChips@compuserve.com]
 Sent:   Thursday, August 19, 1999 7:42 AM
 To:     Prof. Nils Abramson; Pr. Dr. P Anastasovski; Thomas E. Bearden;
Alain
 Beaulieu; Pr. Corneliu Ciubotariu; Prof W. T. Coffey; Lawrence B.
Crowell;
 Dr Laura J. Evans; Dr Gareth J. Evans; Robert G. Flower; Hal Fox; David
 Hamilton; Prof. S. Jeffers; Prof. E. Kapuscik; Roy Keys; Alex Labounsky;
 Prof. Bo Lehnert; Creon Levit; Prof. A. van der Merwe; Dr. Milan Meszaros;
 Dr. Pal Molnar; JOZEF K. MOSCICKI; Prof. Dr. Hector Munera; Prof. Erasmo
 Recami; Prof. Sisir Roy; Prof. Jean-Pierre Vigier
 Subject:        FP and FPL: Speech by the Hon. William Cohen

 I would like to bring to the attention of the scientific community a
 document in the public domain, part of a speech by the Honorable WIliam
 Cohen, U.S. Defense Secretary, at the University of Georgia, Athens, Apr.
 28th 1997, at a conference organized by former Senator Sam Nunn. The
 relevant quote is:
 "Other (terrorists) are enaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby
 they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes, remotely
through  the use of electromagnetic waves.........it's real and that is the
reason
we  have to intensify our (counter terrorism) efforts."
 This speech was released to the press, and is in the public domain. This
 kind of statement cannot be understood in terms of Maxwell Heaviside
theory,  so there is an extremely urgent need to develop a new kind of
 electrodynamics. The principle is that one must assume that such weapons
 exist, or be caught by surprise. Bill Cohen and Sam Nunn are responsible,
 highly experienced, and level headed.
 There is effectively no stable government in the former USSR, a state of
 near anarchy prevails, an extremely dangerous scenario for NATO.
 The conservative academic adherence to an utterly discredited U(1) theory
is  actually leaving NATO wide open to surprise attack in the opinion of
the
US
 Government in the form of the Secretary of Defense. This is also my
personal  opinion as a permanent resident alien of the US, and British /
EEC
citizen.
 The O(3) idea is a first step to what should develop into a massive NATO
 research effort.
 This is why I have been working so intensively on papers in the past few
 months, and ask editors and referees to bear with me and go the extra
mile.

 If we get the second edition of MNO then the pressure on editors and
 referees will be eased.

 Dr. M. W. Evans, 82 Lois Lane, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.

--
http://www.stardrive.org
http://www.ifpa-fly.com/
http://www.usafa.af.mil/dfp/physsurf/
http://www.hia.com/pcr/vigier/slides/Vigier.HTM
http://www.qedcorp.com/book/
http://qedcorp.com/book/bigtest.html
http://www.qedcorp.com/pdf/PQM1.pdf
http://www.qedcorp.com/pdf/lightring.PDF
http://www.hia.com/pcr/
http://cannon.sfsu.edu/grad/lwilliam/index.html