Subj: Fw: [jlnlabs] Re: DeAquino's Antigravity Breakthrough
Date: 1/30/00 5:20:54 AM Pacific Standard Time
From: bcornet@monmouth.com (Bruce Cornet)
To: BARDSQUILL@aol.com


----- Original Message -----
From: Titus
To: jlnlabs@eGroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2000 3:25 AM
Subject: [jlnlabs] Re: DeAquino's Antigravity Breakthrough


sburn-@ibnets.com wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/jlnlabs/?start=2645
> Entire Email Concerning DeAquino's Antigravity Breakthrough
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 8:35 AM
> To: sburns@ironbridgenetworks.com
> Subject: Good News!!! System worked.
>
> Steve,
> Today January 27 , 2000 at 10:15 o'clock AM ( local time )the system-G
> worked. Practical problems are over at least.The apparatus worked well
> and the obtained experimental results confirmed my theoretical
> predictions.
> Fran De Aquino
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Steve Burns
> Data: Quinta-feira, 27 de Janeiro de 2000 11:58
> Assunto: RE: Good News!!! System worked.
>
> Fran,
> Does this mean you obtained significant weight reduction?
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 9:15 AM
> To: sburns@ironbridgenetworks.com
> Subject: En: Good News!!! System worked.
>
> Yes! The weight nullified, and after inverted.All according my mg
> equation.
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Steve Burns
> Data: Quinta-feira, 27 de Janeiro de 2000 12:33
> Assunto: RE: Good News!!! System worked.
>
> Fran,
> I predict you will receive the Nobel prize faster than the high
> temperature superconductor guys. Congratulations and please keep me
> posted.
> Steve
>
> Thanks Steve. This experimental results are the conclusion of the
> research which I began 25 years ago.I am very , very happy.The
> experiment showed another important gravitational phenomenon ; when
the
> total gravitational mass of the annealed iron was nullified, we verify
> the GRAVITATIONAL SHIELDING phenomenon . At this moment disappears the
> weight of everything that is inside of the annealed iron tube ( i.e.,
> iron powder, antenna, etc.), the scale just indicates the weight of
the
> steel tube which involves the one of annealed iron.
> Fran
>
> Fran,
> I believed in it. YOU HAVE A REASON TO BE HAPPY! Can the iron be made
> thinner and still shield? Also, I bet if you decreased frequency, the
> antigravity layer of the iron will cause the apparatus to levitate.
> Steve
>
> Steve
> Yes, the iron can be made thinner ( up to nearly one nanometer)and
> still shield because are the gravitational masses of their ATOMS (
> diameter approx. one Angstron) that still nullified. The annealed iron
> tube is the gravitational shielding WHILE its gravitational still
> nulified.The experiment confirmed that everything inside it lose its
> weight under these conditions.If we decrease the frequency we reduce
> the power radiated by the antenna.This way , we must INCREASE the
> current to produce the apparatus levitation.In the experiment the
> system-G doesn't levitates because the maximun current was 300 A. It
> was necessary nearly 400A.We will try to reach this in a future
> experiment.
> In attachment the archives named "New apparatus1" and "New apparatus2"
> that contains all about the experiment carried out today.If you want ,
> you can try to carry out this experiment it is easy and not
expensive.
> Fran
>
>

Hi Fran and Steve

Congratulations Fran for your breakthrough and I hope you will get the
Nobel prize !!! I also hope your experiment will not remain unknown,
but it will lead to the construction of real spaceships, so that
today,s Science-Fiction will finally become reality ! Could it be
possible?

Titus


------------------------------------------------------------------------