Upon further examination it might be possible that the proportions in the patterns emanating from HAARP in fact exhibit the Golden Ratio. looks like the HAARPsters have discovered the hidden sine wave in the Fibonacci series--those sly devils. When they juice up HAARP on the 23rd, we might all just see the everywhere-shape--expect a brilliant white light that penetrates all. (please note: the above date is in legitimate question)** I think HAARPster-hamster agenda is to throw up a shield around the planet. Why? I wonder (who-what) is in approach to earth? You will be able to see through closed eyes. HAARP would summon-fabricate God--now that could backfire in their faces! ------------------------------------------------------------ I have mapped out this HAARP-Golden ratio thing in the enclosed attachment; furthermore, I have interpreted with a gif construction animation under the heading, "Fabricating God" at: http://members.aol.com/phikent/haarp.htm Those of you who are discussing the BLUE STAR concept, consider that a five-pointed star is also a representation of the Golden Mean as is the dodecahedron, which some think is the basic crystaline endoskeleton of the earth and the basis for the earth grid concept. Might be a good research to identify the exact position of the HAARP array (and other sister installations)relative to the earth grid. SEE: Wondrous Geometry on Mars at: http://members.aol.com/phikent/display.htm We are in for a wild ride! .................................................. I enhanced to bring out the bands of energy on HAARP cam image: This picture was taken: 3/10/97; 3:16:52 PM Alaska Time. 3/11/97; 12:16:52 AM UTC http://server5550.itd.nrl.navy.mil/projects/haarp/cgi.cam.fcgi Image attached as well as posted at: http://members.aol.com/phikent/haarp.htm > Nice try, but you've just demonstrated "banding" (an image artifact caused > by reducing the number of colors available to display an image). In > addition, radio waves do not image onto photographs. I intentionally reduced the colors in order to give shape to the radiant-signature that I perceived to be there. According to legend and paltry few notes Tesla discovered a radiant energy quite separate from normal EM frequencies. This phenomenon, perhaps beyond E=M, seemed to pass through, or exist beyond, molecular(ly)-identified structures that would normally provide shielding from electromagnetic fields. Under certain conditions the aether can be seen with the naked eye. I thought I saw this familiar blue etheric glow in the HAARP cam image. Again, I made an intentional effort to reduce the colors to in order augment the emanating crescent SHAPE of "radiant", not radio, phenomenon. Shape as expressed through geometry is a better vehicle for identifying radiant effect--as opposed to wave or photon theory which speaks for the (lesser or stepped-down toward 3D) electromagnetic effect. A study of dynamic symmetry, for instance the golden ratio, would help to understand radiant FORM. Please think SHAPE as opposed to frequency. Radiant phenomenon is neither matter nor energy--there seems to be something else--in times yore identified as aether. The correct approach in understanding the aether would be toward the gestalt geometry of the universe. HAARP is a Tesla device, not Marconi--the clue. When they power up HAARP, depending on how the device is tuned, we will see that shape-from-everywhere. Kent Steadman ---------------------------------------------------------------- ** question of date At 10:47 AM 3/12/97 -0600, you wrote: > Speaking of the HAARP turn on for the 23rd......Does this have anything to >do with Hale-Bopp approaching the earth at it's closest point around then??? No. There is NO known HAARP Pturn-on planned for the 23rd. Yet more unsourced misinformation on this list. According to the U.S. Navy in an answer to my query: "We are conducting a science research effort currently. This test period will be completed at the end of this week. The next set of tests has not been scheduled as of now." (I've asked for a clarification on this and Kent is checking some of his sources for the unofficial story.) A lot of people (including me) are monitoring shortwave signals from HAARP, so there's no way for them to transmit without our knowing it. By the way, in case you're interested, here's a little perspective to counter some of the rampant HAARP paranoia on this list. First, a reality check: HAARP is currently in a low-power test phase. The scary stuff you've heard about refers to the operational phase, especially when they modulate the signals with ELF (extremely low frequency) signals. That's not happening now (full operation is planned for 1998). HAARP operates at 320 KW (320,000 watts) during the test phase. To give you a idea what that means, that's approximately 1/3 the power of the Voice of America transmitter. Not something that will have any measurable effect on you. Any effects you've noticed are from other sources. Let's talk about some real problems. Take a look at http://server5550.itd.nrl.navy.mil/projects/haarp/compare.html for other megawatt HF transmitters and note the massive amount of energy from the MANY current and planned HF (high frequency) transmitters. And that's just in the HF, or shortwave range. It pales in comparison to the megawatts of energy in own cities beaming into your heads right now, including radio, TV, radar, satellites, and especially cellular towers, which operate at dangerous near-microwave bioactive frequencies, and the whole panoply of classified military systems, especially the High-Power Microwave and EMP (electromagnetic pulse) weapons they test (in New Mexico, for example) without telling us. If the government, electrical power, and communication companies wanted to distract you from these realities, HAARP would be perfect. What's the total power entering our bodies? Good question. Anyone want to volunteer to help me research this? A even bigger problem: HISCAT (http://www.wavegroup.irfu.se:80/HIRO/summary.html), operating at 10 MW (10 million watts, but effective radiated average power of 30 GW, or 30 billion watts) in Sweden for "very deep probing into space" (asteroid detection?), the 1.2 MW (1.2 million watt) facility at Norway (http://www.eiscat.uit.no:80/heater.html), and the planned 1998 operational phase of HAARP at 3.6 MW (3.6 million watts). I'm even more concerned about signals in the brainwave and bioactive regions, like power lines (50 and 60 Hz and their sum and difference signals at 30 and 90 Hz) and electrified trains. Take a look at the diagram at http://www-star.stanford.edu/~mfuelle/eicrspe.html and compare the level of these unnatural signals to the natural Schumann resonance signals (at 7.8 Hz and harmonics) and especially note the intense mystery 82 Hz signal (submarine communication signal, presumably, but I haven't found data on this yet). I'm very concerned too with cellular and microwave signals, which are also bioactive and dangerous. For more on HAARP, see http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/ for the scientific details and Kent Steadman's impressive site at for the intuitive side (and don't miss his home page at , which is the most beautiful Web site I've seen yet). Also see the U.S. Navy HAARP site at http://server5550.itd.nrl.navy.mil/projects/haarp/ for the official propaganda if you must. ------------------------------------------------------------- A note from Alaka locals: I found this in the Astronomy section night..and I was just..alittle..worried. At the start, it is just a nice report of someone seeing the comet for the first time. But the second report remarks on a "hole" seen in the aurora..well, it just should not be there. As to what they saw, I have no idea, but after the firing of the HAARP site, we may now be seeing an effect. So, if you hear of anything new, please pass it on! And, no..it was not a shadow from the comet..you would only see it "through" the aurora Subj: Hale-Bopp and N. Lights Date: 97-03-12 23:12:49 EST From: Lynette688 We live in Chugiak Alaska. My husband first noticed Hale-Bopp on 2/23/97. He was looking out across Cook Inlet from our livingroom windows and noticed what appeared to be "A Comet"! Our sons (10 & 11) then informed us of Hale-Bopp, we have continued to watch a.m. and p.m.. With the short days of winter and a high front keeping the clouds away we have long intervals of viewing, from about 8:00 p.m. to 6:30 a.m.. Last night (03/11/97) the Northern lights were very active and bright. I sat for hours looking out our bedroom window and watching the lights dance and Hale-Bopp shimmer through the lights. At around 2:00 a.m., AK time, I noticed a very dark spot in the lights, stars could be seen all around, but not in this one spot. (It was NOT a cloud). I woke my husband to make sure it was not just because I had been staring at the sky to long. He woke up and commented "Looks like Hale-Bopp's shadow. I had to agree. I had no film, I had just used the last roll at the Willow start of the Iditarod and a baby moose in the yard. Did anyone else observe this shadow ? Does anyone have any scientific knowledge of what this was ? Lynette -------------------------------------------------- The OMEGA File Earth Island Journal, Fall 94: ARCO, Eastlund and the Roots of HAARP -- by Gary Smith: (Note: Following is an interesting by-product of ARCO [the Atlantic Richfield Co.,] which has been getting a good deal of attention throughout Internet discussion groups. Could such a powerful project be used 'against' American citizens by ARCO or other proponents of the 'New World Order'? - Branton) All atomic and electronic technologies -- from household appliances to nuclear weapons -- radiate energetic particles. While the immediate impacts of human-caused electromagnetic pollution are generally imperceptible, the long-term consequences for the biosphere can be profound. In 1988, OMNI magazine raised concerns about the environmental consequences of a bizarre electromagnetic invention. According to OMNI, ARCO, the US oil giant, found itself wondering what to do with the estimated 30 trillion cubic feet of natural gas that it hoped to extract from Alaska's North Slope. While this was enough energy to supply the US for a year, the gas fields were too far from any potential customers. ARCO concluded that it would be too expensive to liquefy the gas and ship it thousands of miles to urban centers. What was needed was a client that wanted access to vast amounts of energy on-site -- in the wilds of Alaska. Bernard Eastland, an MIT and Columbia University physicist with eight years experience with the Atomic Energy Commission, came to the rescue with an extraordinary plan to use the energy "at the point of production." Eastland, who soon became president of ARCO's Production Technologies International Company in Houston, proposed burning the vast Alaskan gas fields to power a huge electric generator. The resulting power would be directed into a huge antenna complex, 40 miles on a side. The antennae would be used to focus an intense beam of electromagnetic energy into the upper atmosphere where it would collide with the ionosphere to create a phenomenon called the "mirror force." Eastland was granted a US Patent (# 4,686,605) for this invention on August 11, 1987. "You can virtually lift part of the upper atmosphere," Eastland told OMNI, "You can make it move, do things to it." One of the tricks Eastland envisioned involved 'surgically' distorting the ionosphere to disrupt global communications. Pushing the upper atmosphere around might also generate high-altitude 'drag' that could heat and deflect enemy missiles or surround them with "high-energy electrons" that might cause the missiles to detonate in mid-trajectory. The proposal appealed to the Pentagon, which invested several hundred thousand dollars 'evaluating' Eastland's work. Eastland maintained that there were 'peaceful' uses for his technology. In one scenario, he explained how beams of electromagnetic power could lift portions of the upper atmosphere and redirect the jetstream to alter global weather patterns. Using "plumes of atmospheric particles to act as a lens or focusing device," Eastland proposed redirecting sunlight and heat to different parts of the Earth's surface, making it possible to manipulate wind patterns, cause rainstorms in Ethiopia, drive hurricanes out of the Caribbean, incinerate airborne industrial pollution and sew up the hole in the Antarctic ozone layer. "Because the upper atmosphere is extremely sensitive to small changes in its composition," OMNI cautioned, "merely TESTING an Eastland Device could cause irreversible damage." And also we have the following article, titled "DOOMSDAY DEATH RAY". Subtitle: "Is the U.S. Government Testing a Secret Mega-Weapon?" -- by "Agent X"., The Nose Magazine, issue #26 [March 1995]. We have to ask ourselves, just WHO will have control of this 'weapon', especially if ARCO is deeply involved with the HAARP project? Beginning some ways into the article: In marked contrast to other advanced weapons-related programs, HAARP is not part of the officially denied 'Blackworld' budget. Rather, the military insists that HAARP is a strictly scientific program to study the aurora borealis [or Northern Lights], when in fact it is a device intended to seriously tweak the ionosphere for purposes that are less than benign. ...BUILT by ARCO Power Technologies, HAARP is due to begin initial testing as this story goes to press. During 1996, a planned $75 million increase to the already multi megabuck project will increase the output of the system to over 1.7 gigawatts, making HAARP the most powerful emitter in the world. Several smaller sites exist around the world, most notably in Russia. Though these installations cannot match the ionosphere heating capabilities of HAARP, some experts in the field who wish not to be quoted suggest that some aberrant weather conditions MAY HAVE been caused by their operation. The weapon-development whiz kids have been interested in this sort of gizmo for quite some time. Just what in hell does the military want with the world's largest weenie roaster? Here are some possible applications I've discovered: EARTH-PENETRATING TOPOGRAPHY: Sort of a CAT scan for the planet. By heating the ionosphere to create a resonant mirror, electronic-beam steering directs an energy stream to specific coordinates on the planet. This energy penetrates the ground to a depth of a kilometer or more, and the signal return is received by satellite or aircraft. After computer processing, A RELATIVELY CLEAR PICTURE OF WHAT IS UNDERGROUND emerges. Damn handy when trying to figure out where those wily North Koreans hide their nukes -- or where YOU keep your stash. HARD-KILL WEAPON SYSTEM: The output of HAARP would have to be boosted a thousand-fold, but if that is accomplished, a shell of high-speed electrons can be constructed that encompasses the earth. Any ballistic missile or warhead passing through the shell would explode. SOFT-KILL WEAPON SYSTEM: By directing enormous amounts of radio-frequency energy at a specific area, HAARP could overload electrical power distribution grids, fry sensitive microelectronics, detonate weapons that use electronic fuses, scramble missile guidance systems and probably upset brain chemistry. WEATHER MODIFICATION: Heating the upper atmosphere over specific areas could change weather patterns, creating torrential floods, destroying an enemy's infrastructure or denying an enemy's harvest by drought... Weather as a weapon. IDENTIFICATION OF SATELLITES: By illuminating orbiting spacecraft with HAARP, the constituent materials and the mission of a satellite can be assessed. COMMUNICATIONS: Possible uses include satellite jamming, satellite communications with submarines and detection of stealth aircraft. Physicist Bernard Eastlund, president of Production Technologies Company AND FORMER 'ARCO' BIGWIG, was granted three patents over the past seven years for a system that looks suspiciously like HAARP - though much larger. His plan, using a transmitter encompassing 160 square miles and powered by massive amounts of electricity generated using vast Alaskan natural gas reserves [to which ARCO has access], was to shoot down missiles and alter the weather. ARCO initially owned Eastlund's patents, but was soon paid a visit by Edward Teller (the "father of the H-Bomb", Nevada Test Site coordinator for the "Star Wars" or SDI defense program, and major MJ-12 member. - Branton.), and development grew secretive. Eastlund declined further involvement, and the patents were quietly sold in June 1994 to E-Systems, a high-tech corporation famous for ultra-secret defense projects such as the president's customized Boeing 747 doomsday plane. "HAARP is the perfect first step towards a plan like mine," Eastlund says. "Advances in phased-array transmitter technology and power generation can produce the field strength required. The government will say it isn't so, but if it quacks like a duck and it looks like a duck, there's a good chance it is duck." "Eastlund is nuts," says an Air Force official speaking on condition of anonymity. "HAARP is much smaller and less powerful than his instrument. We are not doing anything except good science and pure research. "The real beauty of HAARP," he then adds cryptically, "is that nothing you can see on the outside is sensitive. The secret is the beam steering agility and pulsing of the transmissions... When covert operations occur, the science team, the operating funds and the mission will be black." Whatever is going on, Alaskans are mad as hell. The federal government enjoys a long tradition of screwing over the inhabitants of the Last Frontier. Generally speaking, the feds are as welcome as a case of herpes. And studies done by the EPA, the Swedish government and others indicate that HAARP could interfere with communications, navigation systems, wildlife migration and possibly human health. "There has never been a transmitter of this power in this frequency," Eastlund says. "It would be wise to assess its impact." Though there are many questions, the military insists that all is well and there is nothing to worry about. "We are not doing anything to the ionosphere -- we are just looking at it," insists Air Force Phillips Laboratory spokesman Roy Heitman. Although an ad-hoc grassroots organization called NO HAARP is trying to stop the project, founder Clare Zickuhr admits, "It's all a whitewash, [HAARP] is going to happen." An ARCO retiree, Zickuhr is convinced HAARP is a secret weapons project. "It has all the appearances of a secret program. This is not good science -- they have no idea what this thing could do to the ionosphere. To put this in the hands of the military scares the hell out of me." (Remember however that, although this particular ex-ARCO employee - Zickuhr -- is against the project, the HAARP facility in Alaska was never-the-less CONSTRUCTED by ARCO POWER TECHNOLOGIES. So Zickuhr's views apparently do not reflect the views of ARCO in general in regards to the project. - Branton) And if you're not yet convinced that ARCO -- The ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY -- is a front for the fascist "Nazifeller" New World Order infiltration of, if not invasion of, North America, then try this one on for size: ARCO-ALYESKA, WACKINHUT, ILLEGAL SPYING, ORGANIZED CRIME... ("Oh what a tangled web we weave..."): STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE GEORGE MILLER CHAIRMAN, HOUSE INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT HEARINGS ON ALYESKA COVERT OPERATIONS NOVEMBER 4, 1991 (A few excerpts from this lengthy hearing appear below - Branton): "This is the first of two days of hearings before the House Interior Committee on the subject of covert surveillance authorized by the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company and conducted by The WACKENHUT Corporation. "On August 7 of this year, the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs filed a written request for documents from Wackenhut and Alyeska in connection with allegations that the Wackenhut Corporation conducted undercover surveillance of Charles Hamel on behalf of Alyeska and its OWNER companies. In letters to both Wackenhut and Alyeska, I expressed concern that the surveillance of Mr. Hamel was for the purpose of obtaining information on and/or interfering with Mr. Hamel's communications with this Committee. "Charles Hamel has been a source of information for Congress, state and federal regulatory agencies, and the media, concerning environmental, health and safety VIOLATIONS by Alyeska and its oil company owners (that is, ARCO or Atlantic Richfield. - Branton). Mr. Hamel has served as a conduit for whistleblowers, including Alyeska employees, to make public information on oil industry practices. At the same time, Mr. Hamel has at least two significant business disputes with ALYESKA and EXXON... "In the next two days, we will explore the issue of whether Alyeska's use of a 'bogus' environmental group formed by Wackenhut spies was an effort to disrupt and compromise a source of information for this Committee's continuing investigation of oil industry practices in Alaska... "In my view, it is important to find out why some of the largest and most powerful corporations in this country would resort to such elaborate 'sting' tactics to INVADE and DESTROY the privacy of Mr. Hamel, federal and state officials, environmentalists and ordinary citizens... "We believe that the testimony and the evidence presented in these hearings during the next two days will show that the covert surveillance operation involved the much more sinister and disturbing motives of SILENCING environmental critics and intimidating whistleblowers..." -------------------------------------------------- Date sent: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 22:48:16 -0700 To: webmaster@cseti.org, "betnal@ns.net" From: "A.J. Craddock" Subject: HAARP - More Disturbing News HAARP has always had a bad smell to it, and this erudite and credible post raises the ugly specter of us paying for one Government Program to destroy another. One wonders what HAARP's true purpose really is? Tony Craddock Web Administrator CSETI http://www.cseti.org To: Jeane Manning I have read two of your books, "The Coming Energy Revolution," and "Angels Don't Play this Haarp." Thank you for the excellent expositional works. They have meant alot to me. I found out about you through an old friend, Walt Rosenthal. He encouraged me to share my ideas with you, so here goes the first one. In thinking about the HAARP project, I started thinking about what it means to spacecraft within that region of the ionosphere, and I mean normal everyday spacecraft such as the space shuttle and satellites. It means very bad things. Even if they limit themselves to increasing the charge particle density to only double or triple, ionospheric heating still means more energetic particles on average, and this will have catastrophic effects on certain spacecraft materials. I have just completed a three year study of ionospheric interactions with the new International Space Station, and even though the problem is still very fresh in my mind, it took awhile for me to grasp what an ionospheric heater is really doing, then it took me even longer to analyze these effects and apply understand the ramifications on my recent work. If I understand you correctly, we could start out by saying that the ionosphere is comprised primarily of Atomic Oxygen. In its natural state (before the invention of electricity) a fraction of this oxygen (and the other constituent gases) was constantly being ionized by solar and other radiations. The ionized atoms would then re-combine with an electron (usually within milliseconds) to lose their charge. Thus an equilibrium condition was reached, where depending on the level of solar activity, the portion of the atmospheric gases in that region settled in the ballpark of 0.01 - 0.1% ionized gas at any one time. This condition began to change however, with the advent of hi-power transmission equipment and power lines. The new technology affected both the ionization and re-combination processes, and resulted in localized effects to the ionosphere. Now enter spacecraft into the picture. NASA has been fighting a war for a decade on the effects that Atomic Oxygen has on polymer spacecraft materials. Essentially what's happening is that Atomic Oxygen is ramming into the weak organic chemical bonds at orbital + thermal velocities, and eroding away the material slowly. This is essentially the same thing that will happen with the ionized portion of the ionosphere as well, but only if the particular spacecraft structure is electrically neutral. As a detail point, the ionized atoms tend to be at the higher end of the gasses' energy distribution, because once they become ionized they become accelerated by electric forces. Conversely, atoms which are ionized by deliberate application of EM fields get accelerated by that same EM field, hence the effect of raising temperature. The ionospheric heater fits in here I now realize. And it is insanity. Consider the effects on the new thin-film Space Station Solar Arrays. They do not have the property of being electrically neutral in the ionosphere by any means. 1,000 to 20,000 times a second, the entire EM field surrounding them is collapsed by the voltage regulating SSU (non-shunt) circuit controller, and herein lies the problem. The copper circuitry is covered by 2 - 10 mil thick polymers like Kapton. When we analyzed the naturally occuring effects that the ionized portion of the ionosphere has on the arrays in 1994, we found the following interesting fact. The AC electric field present in the array circuitry switches 140 volts at 1 khz, and couples like a capacitor to the ions through the Kapton dielectric. The ions then slam the charged particles into the array polymers with a velocity fifty times greater than the orbital/thermal velocities of the non-charged gasses. That's like 2,000 times the energy in the collision. The result is that these atoms now have enough energy to damage copper and steel. The process is well known as ion sputtering. When we completed our analysis, the result was within an order of magnitude of saying that the arrays would not survive the requisite fifteen years. We argued and argued and eventually NASA took responsibility of the problem from us. AKA it disappeared. We based our analysis on the 1986 model of the ionosphere which takes no man-made ionospheric effects into account. If either the ionized fraction of the ionosphere or the average temperature goes up, well you can imagine what will happen. I have seen papers about HAARP which say that they have succeeded in heating the ionosphere thousands of degrees. Is this true? The patent says that the charged particle density can be increased greatly. How much? Increasing it a hundred fold could burn out the arrays in hours. And I mean burn out too, so that a re-design and another shuttle flight would be required to save the day. Now let's think for a minute. If someone were to challenge the Space Station Program Office with this information, talking about how HAARP poses a threat to the Space Station, people would have to respond. NASA would either have to admit that a re-design is necessary, (No power system, no space station game), or cover it up and pencil-whip it (not likely if the right people were put in motion), or cancel the Space Station program altogether to hide the truth. Now I love the Space Station program, but I don't like incompetency resulting in one government program I am paying for destroying another government I am paying for. I'm thinking of raising hell, but I don't want to do it alone. So far very few people know of this, and I'd like that to change. If you're interested please contact me: Clark Dunson PO Box 854 Palo Alto, CA 94302 (415)323-4348 PM dunson.clark@ssd.loral.com Thanks for your time. -------------------------------------------------- Subject: IUFO: A Portable HAARP Project? Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 08:31:38 -0700 (PDT) From: ptcusa Reply-To: iufo@world.std.com To: iufo@world.std.com -> SearchNet's IUFO Mailing List Sounds like a portable HAARP project. At 10:39 AM 7/18/97 -0400, you wrote: >Very good James, >I have a device which emits very large amounts of scalar waves. It is >called a Life Energy Amplifier. Anyone but the most dense person can >literally feel the energy that is coming off this thing. Fortunately it >is positive. Those of us who are sensitive cannot turn it up too high >without feeling like our head is becoming a balloon. Scalar waves are >very real! >Elora -------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 06:39:57 -1000 From: Ruth Trimble